Thursday, 16 December 2010
PLANNING: Pitching my Music Video
Wednesday, 15 December 2010
RESEARCH: Alternative Forms of Marketing and Media Convergence
CD sales are on a continuous decline. With the boom in download sites such as itunes and online streaming sites such as Youtube, it is far more economical to download the one song you want for 0.79p than buy the whole album. As a consequence bands/artists are finding new ways to market themselves, whether it be embracing the download market or offering free 'added value' packages to woo fans. CD album sales in dropped by 3.5% in 2009 to 128.9 million, the fifth year in a row they have fallen. But the fall was eased by a 56.1% rise in album downloads to 16.1 million, now accounting for one in eight sold. Such statistics are hard to avoid, bands can no longer rely on traditional methods of marketing, they have to reach the masses, most of whom are armed with computers and Internet access. This is particularly important given that my music video is for an Arctic Monkeys song, and the band first achieved success through social networking sites such as Myspace before they scored their record deal with Domino. However where Arctic Monkeys method varied from others is that their Internet effort was created by fans, who in 2004 created a profile for the band to get their music out there. By the end of 2004 Arctic Monkeys had become the first of the Myspace Phenomenons and had a huge following not on the internet. As a consequence of online effort Arctic Monkeys were able to self market and manage their growing fan base, so that by the time it came to accepting record deals they had their own pull as the label was guaranteed an already strong fan base, thus producing revenue. Due to artists taking the hands on approach to marketing, when they do sign deals the marketing department is usually unneeded, as they have a strong group of fans who, by word of mouth, can promote for them.
PLANNING: Initial Ideas (Song Choice)
RESEARCH: Interactive Media and Audience Theories
Given that music videos producers are heading in the direction of interactivity, and realise they need to engage their audience to keep up revenue, they are consequently using active audience theories as a model to follow when deciding how best to draw audiences in to the full music video experience. An example of an active audience theory is the 'Audience Reception Model'. This theory points out that meaning of any text is created by the audience - not the producer. Meaning is encoded into the text but it is up to the audience what they take from it depending how they decode the signs within the text. Broadly speaking the audience can arrive at one of three readings:
- The Preferred Reading - Audience understands and accepts the ideology offered.
- The Negotiated Reading - Audience understands the ideology offered, accepts some aspects of it but rejects other aspects.
- The Oppositional Reading - Audience interprets the ideology offered in the opposite way than it is intended.
Tuesday, 14 December 2010
RESEARCH: Arctic Monkeys' Video Style
Monday, 13 December 2010
RESEARCH: Applying Media Theories
When
the Sun Goes Down,
which follows a clear narrative, and the story told through the lyrics is amplified by the visual narrative.) Therefore to make sure my piece conforms to typical conventions of a music video, I will edit it so that the shots compliment the music. For example, when the music increases tempo, the cuts will be quicker to mirror this. Similarly when the song reaches it's peak in both tempo and volume the cuts will amplify this to emphasis the clear tie between the music and visuals.RESEARCH: Questionnaire Results
-- HURTS --
Wednesday, 24 November 2010
RESEARCH: Questionnaire
Arctic Monkeys Fluorescent Adolescent
Lady Gaga Beautiful, Dirty, Rich
Disregard any prior knowledge of the songs and focus on the video itself rather than the artist/band.
1. On first viewing, which of the three videos most appeals to you and why?
a. Hurts b. Arctic Monkeys c. Lady Gaga
2. How important do you think it is that a music video’s images correspond to the lyrics of the song?
a. Very important b. Moderately important c. Not important
3. Which video do you feel is most successful in relating the lyrics to the imagery?
a. Hurts b. Arctic Monkeys c. Lady Gaga
4. Do you like there to be a level of continuity between a Band/Artist’s various music videos? (For example OK Go!)
a. Yes b. No
If yes, then why?
These questions refer to Hurts Stay
5. What about this video appeals to you most?
6. How effective do you feel the choice of location was in creating the mood of the video?
a. Very effective b. Quite Effective c. Ineffective
7. Do you think this video would have been as successful had it been shot indoors?
a. Yes b. No
8. Do you think the video would have been as effective had the band not been featured?
a. Yes b. No
If yes, why?
9. What about this video appeals to you most?
10. How important do you think the use of costume was in creating the mood for the video?
a. Very important b. Quite important c. Unimportant
11. The video has an amateur feel – do you feel it would have been as successful had it been shot in a professional manner? (With more emphasis put on lighting and steady camera shots)
a. Yes b. No
12. Do you think the video would have been more effective had the band been featured?
a. Yes b. No
If yes, why?
These questions refer to Gaga Beautiful, Dirty, Rich
13. What about this video appeals to you most?
14. How important do you think the use of props was in setting the scene for this video?
a. Very important b. Quite important c. Unimportant
15. To what extent do you feel the lighting used in this video adds to the overall video quality?
16. Do you think the video would have been as effective had the artist not been featured?
a. Yes b. No
If yes, why?
Thank You for Partaking
Tuesday, 9 November 2010
RESEARCH: Pop- Culture References in Music Videos
Wednesday, 3 November 2010
RESEARCH: Minimalism vs. Elaboration
CASE STUDY: Hurts Wonderful Life, Lady Gaga Beautiful, Dirty, Rich
There are two major routes towards making music videos that labels are currently following. You have relatively unknown bands like Hurts who are making stark minimalist videos that reflect the 'what you see is what you get' attitude of the band. It's a far cry from the dripping decadence of a Lady Gaga music video that is less music video and more feature film.
When Lady Gaga releases a new single, no one hopes for an accurate depiction of everyday life. Though her work isn't entirely surrealist and it usually has a fluent narrative throughout the video, it represents a lifestyle that is unknown and exotic to your average-Joe fan. Each video becomes an almost fulfilling prophecy; each one out does the previous as each has a bigger budget, thus her fame grows and each video gets more hype and popularity. At the other end of the spectrum is Hurts who despite being a relatively new band have built an image on cool minimalism that is displayed not only via their music videos but through their clothes and how they carry themselves.
Hurts' Wonderful Life relies on lingering shots of seemingly still images. The video reeks of 1950/60s LA, with the whole thing being shot around a pool, with all the cast wearing black or white. Though the pool location is exceptionally tried and tested - there are no bikini-clad women, instead the choreographed element to the video seems to centre on a synchronised swim team. Continuing Hurts' tradition of a long drawn out introduction the song doesn't get going until 15 seconds in. Though the in between shots are that of still figures, the eye is not drawn away from the perfect shapes silhouetted by the dancers or the contrast between the blue of the pool and the grey sky.
When the song gets going, the shots are edited in time and it switches between a narrative (presumably a man who has lost someone) and the duo performing. Though the main colour palette for the piece is grey, the way in which it is shot appears expensive, and the stark minimalism appears plush.
In stark contrast, Beautiful, Dirty, Rich begins in the typical Gaga manner; an extreme closeup of shocking red lips that is instantly identifiable as the artist herself. From then we see a slow moving group walking towards the camera, cut in time to the music. The camera position in correspondence to the figures is hugely important, as the group (headed by Lady Gaga) walk towards the camera in a way that signifies authority and power, instantly drawing the eye to the artist who is miming the lyrics. To tie in the title, there is money being thrown about and it is shot in a lavish mansion; everything to submerge the audience in a lifestyle that is completely unknown. There is something intriguing about getting a glimpse into the Hollywood lifestyle, and this video plays it to the maximum, with money being burnt, mansions being trashed, to suggest frivolity and carelessness.
The two videos launch the viewer into an unknown world, both provide a glimpse of the unfamiliar, from Gaga's decadent surroundings to the old world glamour of the Hurts. Though Hurts goes for a 'less is more' approach in their filming, the video doesn't appear any less professional than one that has clearly required a volume of props, hair, make up, costume etc. Therefore, what I can draw from these two videos is that to get a clean, professional finish, I will need to put serious thought into my lighting and location. The location needs to reflect the theme of the song, much as it does in these two videos. The lighting will be exceptionally important, and I will experiment with different techniques such as vignette, so that the edges fade off for the same exclusivity that Beautiful, Dirty, Rich emulates. I will either chose to go down the lavish route, where the eye is drawn to the brilliant, eye catching costumes and strong imagery, or via the minimalist route where shots are drawn out to accentuate the narrative of the piece.